Late Disclosure of Expert Witness Reports in an Arizona Divorce

Tue 8th Mar, 2022 Arizona Child Custody Laws

So, what happens when an expert’s report is disclosed too late.

Dispute Over the Late Disclosure of a Child Custody Evaluation in Arizona

Wife and Husband have two children. Husband lived in Rhode Island and Wife lived in Arizona. Wife filed for dissolution of their marriage after becoming pregnant with husband’s third child. The parties agreed that the children would spend the school year with one parent and summers with the other parent.

There was a dispute, however, over which parent would be the primary residential parent. After evidence was submitted and reviewed, the court ordered Husband be the primary residential parent.

Two years later, Wife filed to modify the parenting plan claiming Husband was not providing the children with the necessary standard of care.

All description of expected expert witness testimony and their written reports were to be submitted to the court by October 14, 2016. Wife did not disclose her expert witness testimony until October 21, 2016. The court ordered a continuance of the initial trial to accommodate Wife’s failure to timely disclose her expert witnesses expected testimony and supplemental report. Wife missed that deadline as well.

The court eventually allowed Wife’s expert to provide his report of the children’s well-being and ultimately denied wife’s petition to modify because she failed to show a substantial and continuing change of circumstances that would justify a change in the children’s primary physical residence.

Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure Require Disclosure at Least 60 Days Before Trial

Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure 49(H) obliges each party to disclose, at least 60 days before trial, all information regarding any expert witness he or she intends to call at trial. Mother was ordered to follow this 60-day requirement but allegedly did not comply and her evidence was therefore not timely.

Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure 65(C)(1) provides that when a party fails to disclose information in a timely manner, he or she “shall not, unless such failure is harmless, be permitted to use as evidence at trial, at a hearing, or in support of a motion, the information or the testimony of a witness not disclosed, except by leave of court for good cause shown.”

U.S. News and World Report Votes Hildebrand Law, PC Best Law Firms for 2020 2021 2022 2023

Late Disclosure of an Expert’s Report Must Be Prejudicial to the Other Party

Ultimately, the court held that the untimely disclosure deprived Father of a fair opportunity to obtain Wife’s expert’s report, to schedule a deposition, or to allow Father’s expert witness the necessary time to prepare a rebuttal report.”

The appeals court rejected Mother’s argument Father had ample time to cure this prejudice and his failure to depose Wife’s expert in the two weeks before trial constituted “lying in wait” and using the discovery rules as a “weapon.”

Wife was also aware the Supplemental Report was forthcoming and failed to give Husband advance warning or seek leave from the court to disclose the report when it became available.

Wife asserted in the Superior Court that her late disclosure occurred because of illnesses, staff turnover and absences at her counsel’s office in February 2017, and Mother’s inability to pay her expert to prepare the Supplemental Report until February 2017.

Even if the Court accepted Wife’s justification, she was aware a report would be forthcoming and failed to request a continuance or alert anyone to the impending disclosure, or the issues she encountered in producing the document. Accordingly, the Superior Court rejected her argument.

Hays v. Gama Does Not Prevent a Judge from Excluding an Expert Witness and/or an Expert Report That Was Disclosed Late

Wife-citing Hays v. Gama, 205 Ariz. 99 (2003)-argues that despite her disclosure violation, the superior court improperly excluded the Supplemental Report because “a trial court abuses its discretion when it excludes evidence that impacts a child’s best interests.”

Hays is distinguishable from this case. In contrast to Hays, here, Mother failed to comply with Rule 49(H) and failed to show good cause for her non-compliance. Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure 65(C) therefore authorized the superior court to exclude the untimely disclosed Supplemental Report.

Additionally, unlike the evidentiary sanctions in Hays, the Superior Court did not omit any evidence that had an “especially significant effect” on its ability to determine the best interests of the child.

The court admitted Wife’s expert’s original report, and she testified that the children had adjusted poorly to Husband’s home, their relationship with Wife had been disrupted, and Wife was more “attuned” to the children’s needs. Wife claims the Supplemental Report contained new information critical to her case.

Specifically, she cites the expert’s summaries of her interviews and observations of the children and her opinions that the children were suffering from their removal from Mother’s primary care at young ages.

She also criticized Husband’s expert’s methodology and opinion that the children were well-adjusted to Husband’s home. Wife’s expert’s original report contained similar concerns regarding the children’s poor adjustment to being separated from Wife and her conclusion that Husband was not attuned to the children’s needs.

Further, with respect to the child interviews in which the middle child allegedly expressed a desire to live with Wife and the oldest child allegedly expressed frustration about the quality of her education in Rhode Island, the court found, as part of its best interests’ analysis, the children were too young for it to give weight to their preferences.

This gave the court enough information regarding the children’s best interest; the Superior Court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the supplemental report.

If you have questions about timely disclosing expert witness testimony and reports in a divorce case in Arizona, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona family law attorneys have decades of combined experience successfully representing clients in child custody and family law cases.

Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.

Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your child custody or family law case around today.

Frequently Asked Question About Disclosure in an Arizona Divorce

What is Rule 49 Disclosure in Arizona?

Rule 49 is a rule found in the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure governing processes and procedures used by all family law courts throughout Arizona. Specifically, Rule 49 requires each party to disclose certain information and documentation to the other spouse in a divorce or related family law case.

What is the Disclosure of an Expert Witness in an Arizona Divorce or other Family Law Case?

A person in a divorce or other family law case who has hired an expert to issue an expert opinion to be used as evidence in the case must disclose the expert’s resume, written report, and contact information either 60 days prior to trial or some other date set by the court.

Contact Form

Hildebrand Law, PC Voted Best Divorce Law Firm in Arizona in Arizona Foothills Magazine

Categories