Omitted Assets in an Arizona Divorce Decree | Hildebrand Law, PC

Tue 22nd Dec, 2015 Arizona Community Property Laws

A divorce decree in Arizona is intended to divide all community property between the spouses.

So, what happens to omitted assets in an Arizona divorce decree. Often a “catch-all” provision in the decree states that all property in the physical possession of each spouse belongs to that spouse.

Arizona Court of Appeals Rules on Reopening a Case to Divide Assets Not Divided in a Divorce Decree

In the case of Ringear v. Rinegar, 290 P.3d 1208 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012) the Arizona Court of Appeals discussed whether a divorce court has the authority to reopen the case when community property is accidentally omitted.

Wife and Husband married in 1999 and divorced in 2006. Wife worked for Qwest, and, as part of her compensation, received earned various retirement benefits, including a qualified pension plan, a non-qualified pension plan, stock options, and a 401(K) savings and investment plan.

U.S. News and World Report Votes Hildebrand Law, PC Best Law Firms for 2020 2021 2022 2023

Retirement Assets that Were Not Divided in an Arizona Divorce Decree

The Rinegars entered into a divorce agreement dividing their property and debt, but the contract specifically excluded the Qwest retirement assets.

When the matter came to trial in September 2005, the court determined that more testimony was necessary to resolve the issue of spousal support for Husband. The divorce trial was continued until July 2006, before a different judge.

During the trial, Husband’s expert testified that the qualified pension plan and the 401(k) plan could be divided between the spouses, but a non-qualified pension plan could not be divided until Wife received it. The second judge approved the divorce agreement, divided the qualified pension plan and the 401(k) and awarded spousal support.

However, no mention was made of the stock options or the nonqualified pension plan. The decree contained a catch-all provision allocating to each party the property in their respective possession as their sole and separate property.

In 2010, Husband sent a request for information about those accounts to Qwest and filed a motion to reopen the divorce decree to allocate them. Wife opposed this, but the court agreed with Husband. It also ordered Wife to pay his attorney fees.

A Divorce Court Can Reopen a Decree to Allocate Omitted Assets

Reopening a Divorce to Divide Assets Left Out of the Divorce Decree in Arizona.

The Court of Appeals first made clear that an Arizona divorce court has the authority to reopen a decree if community assets are inadvertently omitted.

It contrasted this with the rule that assets a couple deliberately omits from the decree cannot serve as the basis of a motion to reopen.

A “Catch-All” Provision Awarding All Property in Each Spouse’s Possession Does Not Control the Award of Retirement Assets Omitted from a Divorce Decree

Wife argued that the catch-all provision awarded the non-qualified pension plan and the stock options to her since they were personal property in her possession.

However, the Court of Appeals disagreed. It noted that the law requires that property allocated in a catch-all provision must be specifically described in the divorce. The mere mention of other retirement assets during the divorce proceeding was not sufficient.

The Court concluded: “The assets at issue are complex and are not the type of property that can properly be disposed of in a catch-all provision.”

Hildebrand Law, PC | Voted Best of Our Valley in Arizona Foothills Magazine.

The Rule on Omitted Assets in an Arizona Divorce Decree

The general rule in Arizona is that community assets must be divided equally between the spouses unless circumstances make an equal award unfair.

Wife argued that since Husband received the marital home, the court meant her to have these retirement assets to balance the equities.

The Court of Appeals did not agree. It noted that the divorce court lowered spousal support payments to Husband to balance the equities of his being awarded the marital home, and never mentioned these retirement assets as an offset.

It also stated that if Wife were allowed to keep these large retirement assets as her separate property, the result would be an inequitable division of property.

Delay in Dividing Assets Omitted in a Divorce Decree Is Not a Waiver

The Rule on Dividing Assets Omitted from a Divorce Decree.

Last, Wife argued that Husband waived his right to request part of these assets because he waited until 2010 to ask for them.

The Court of Appeals rejected this since the delay did not hurt Wife in any way. Further, it ruled that the divorce court’s award of attorney fees to Husband was appropriate given the fact that Wife’s salary was twice Husband’s salary. It also awarded Husband his attorney fees on appeal.

Attorneys Experienced in Dividing Assets Not Divided in an Arizona Divorce Decree

If you need information about what to do with omitted assets in a divorce in Arizona, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona community property and family law attorneys have decades of combined experience successfully representing clients in dividing community property and family law cases.

Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.

Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona family law case around today.

Categories